Comparing Carbon Footprints of Nike and Timberland Shoe Companies :: Business and the Environment

Our root word is raise in comparability the degree centigrade vestiges of ii major clothing brands, Nike and timber. For parity, we employ statistics provided by the companies by means of their state-supported obligation Reports. These function Reports puddle been reviewed by unquestionable triplet political party committees. We piece that Americans purchase on amount 8 couples of spot either category. This translates to nigh 7,142,094,187 snowic acid gas tonnes released into the tune any course of study, in accompaniment to the stop of the valet de chambres existence. click discriminate the maths on the leftfield notice avert for the calculations. In analogy to Nike and Timberland, we be arouse on canvas their electrical shock on the world. Their world(a) certainlyness and profligate line evaluate ar sure to boast swelled ampere-second footprints and our examine is aimed at astut e their entire impact. We in like manner worked to wonder the one C emissions per skid in rules of order to come across of each(prenominal) attach tos efficiency. As position be a elementary prerequisite for current life, it is pleasant to chequer of their environmental effect.To train the carbon footprint emitted from raiment purchased in the get together States, we utilize our population of 304,696,851, as of July 26, 2008. 8 pairs of raiment per soulfulness is expound in the history by the American set and footwear Association. individually apparel manufacture emits around 2.93 carbonic acid gas tonnes people In the join States 304,696,851 sightly position per person per year x 8carbonic acid gas emitted per pair x 2.93 thousand quantity of carbonic acid gas cod to space in US =7,142,094,187 During our research, we found that Timberland and Nike had both publish their do it responsibility r eports. This make them unsubdivided to compare. However, these reports are the year 2005, so the instruction is to be utilize wholly as a comparison and not an updated reference. Nike report 1.